Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Cambodia
Cambodia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per was 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Cambodia, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Cambodia recorded 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 28.3% on the previous year and up 37.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Cambodia peaked at 102.2 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, -0.5665 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1985.
Cambodia ranks 46th of 134 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Cambodia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 4.36 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +124.7% |
| 1972 | 9.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 1979 | 5.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.7% |
| 1980 | 8.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.5% |
| 1981 | 4.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.8% |
| 1982 | 5.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1984 | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.4% |
| 1985 | -0.5665 current US$ per square kilometre | -147.6% |
| 1990 | 2.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -550.0% |
| 1991 | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.1% |
| 1992 | 3.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +119.4% |
| 1993 | 9.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.0% |
| 1994 | 7.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.5% |
| 1995 | 11.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.2% |
| 1996 | 5.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.7% |
| 1997 | 13.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +166.7% |
| 1998 | 3.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.7% |
| 1999 | 14.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +264.7% |
| 2000 | 11.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 2001 | 27.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +147.2% |
| 2002 | 37.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.3% |
| 2003 | 35.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 2004 | 59.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.2% |
| 2005 | 52.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 2006 | 64.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.0% |
| 2007 | 73.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 2008 | 77.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2009 | 93.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 2010 | 102.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2011 | 54.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.5% |
| 2012 | 41.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.8% |
| 2013 | 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.2% |
| 2014 | 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.5% |
| 2015 | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 2016 | 0.3367 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.2% |
| 2017 | 7.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +2060.1% |
| 2018 | 0.0019 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2020 | 13.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +728583.7% |
| 2021 | 12.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 2022 | 15.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.5% |
| 2023 | 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 7.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 1980s | 3.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5665 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1990s | 7.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 53.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 93.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 24.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0019 current US$ per square kilometre | 102.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2020s | 13.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Cambodia
- 43 Mauritius 14.78 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Myanmar 14.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Hungary 12.72 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 47 Timor-Leste 11.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 48 Togo 10.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 49 Zimbabwe 9.46 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Cambodia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 47,298 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 3.68 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.35 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 53.33 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 19.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 36.80 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 25.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 187,485 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 598,824 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 350.83 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Cambodia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Cambodia was 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Cambodia?
- The highest recorded value was 102.2 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Cambodia?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.5665 current US$ per square kilometre in 1985.
- How does Cambodia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- Cambodia ranks 46th out of 134 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per rising or falling in Cambodia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 37.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cambodia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 42 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.