Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Myanmar
Myanmar: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per was 14.19 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Myanmar, 1976–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Myanmar is 14.19 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 17.7% on the previous year and down 60.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Myanmar peaked at 48.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017 and was at its lowest, -0.3213 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1989.
Myanmar ranks 44th of 134 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Myanmar, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1976 | 0.2448 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0.1071 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.3% |
| 1978 | 8.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +7942.9% |
| 1979 | 15.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.6% |
| 1980 | 17.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 1981 | 8.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.6% |
| 1982 | 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.3% |
| 1983 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.9% |
| 1984 | 4.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +336.8% |
| 1985 | 7.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.2% |
| 1986 | 4.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.9% |
| 1987 | 0.3672 current US$ per square kilometre | -91.3% |
| 1988 | 0.5202 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.7% |
| 1989 | -0.3213 current US$ per square kilometre | -161.8% |
| 1995 | 0.2448 current US$ per square kilometre | -176.2% |
| 1996 | 0.2754 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1997 | 0.3978 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.4% |
| 1998 | 0.4131 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1999 | 0.6427 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.6% |
| 2001 | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +138.1% |
| 2002 | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 2003 | 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.7% |
| 2004 | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.5% |
| 2005 | 4.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +258.9% |
| 2006 | 4.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 2007 | 12.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +177.8% |
| 2008 | 29.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +141.9% |
| 2009 | 14.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.7% |
| 2010 | 16.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 2011 | 16.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2012 | 29.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.0% |
| 2013 | 35.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.8% |
| 2014 | 38.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2015 | 11.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.4% |
| 2016 | 10.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2017 | 48.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +355.3% |
| 2018 | 38.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 2019 | 44.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 2020 | 38.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 2021 | 34.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 2022 | 17.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.9% |
| 2023 | 14.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 6.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1071 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 1980s | 4.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3213 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.3948 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2448 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6427 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 2000s | 7.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2010s | 29.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 48.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 25.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 38.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Myanmar
- 41 Djibouti 16.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Singapore 14.93 current US$ per square kilometre
- 43 Mauritius 14.78 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Hungary 12.72 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 46 Cambodia 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 47 Timor-Leste 11.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Myanmar
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 177,088 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 204,753 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 35.68 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 79.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 45.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 39.71 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 9.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 404.83 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Myanmar?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Myanmar was 14.19 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Myanmar?
- The highest recorded value was 48.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Myanmar?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.3213 current US$ per square kilometre in 1989.
- How does Myanmar rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- Myanmar ranks 44th out of 134 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per rising or falling in Myanmar?
- Over the last ten years it is down 60.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Myanmar data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 42 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.