China vs Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark … Denmark square

China
0.0453 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Korea
0.1037 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1998
China rank
113th
Korea rank
110th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark … Denmark square over time

  • China
  • Korea
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Korea currently reports 0.1037 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0453 current US$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.0584 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Korea's figure about 2.3 times China's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Korea ahead.

China ranks 113th and Korea ranks 110th of 134 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Korea Difference Ahead
1980s 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre -0.4769 current US$ per square kilometre 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre China
1990s 0.5704 current US$ per square kilometre 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, China or Korea?
Korea, at 0.1037 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0453 current US$ per square kilometre in China as of 1998.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between China and Korea?
0.0584 current US$ per square kilometre, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Korea?
16 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 1998.
How do China and Korea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
China ranks 113th and Korea ranks 110th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/korea-rep/">China vs Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,725 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.