Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in China
China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per was 0.0453 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in China, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
China recorded 0.0453 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 62.4% on the previous year and up 107.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in China peaked at 2.47 current US$ per square kilometre in 1987 and was at its lowest, -1.97 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2003.
That places China 113th out of 134 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in China, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 0.0021 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0.0064 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1982 | 0.9043 current US$ per square kilometre | +14050.0% |
| 1983 | 0.5528 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.9% |
| 1984 | 0.2311 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.2% |
| 1985 | 0.8862 current US$ per square kilometre | +283.4% |
| 1986 | 2.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +131.0% |
| 1987 | 2.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 1988 | 2.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 1989 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.6% |
| 1990 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1991 | 0.7222 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.2% |
| 1992 | 1.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +118.6% |
| 1993 | 0.3962 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.9% |
| 1994 | -0.033 current US$ per square kilometre | -108.3% |
| 1995 | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -3348.4% |
| 1996 | 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +107.7% |
| 1997 | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.4% |
| 1998 | -0.4101 current US$ per square kilometre | -128.1% |
| 1999 | 0.0064 current US$ per square kilometre | -101.6% |
| 2000 | -0.1821 current US$ per square kilometre | -2950.0% |
| 2001 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -698.2% |
| 2002 | 0.6721 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.3% |
| 2003 | -1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -393.5% |
| 2004 | 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -187.3% |
| 2005 | 0.507 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.5% |
| 2006 | 0.5837 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 2007 | -0.2716 current US$ per square kilometre | -146.5% |
| 2008 | 0.0373 current US$ per square kilometre | -113.7% |
| 2009 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +4108.6% |
| 2010 | 0.0799 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.9% |
| 2011 | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +1510.7% |
| 2012 | 0.6018 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.2% |
| 2013 | -0.6089 current US$ per square kilometre | -201.2% |
| 2014 | -1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.1% |
| 2015 | 0.0446 current US$ per square kilometre | -104.4% |
| 2016 | 0.349 current US$ per square kilometre | +682.2% |
| 2017 | -0.9688 current US$ per square kilometre | -377.6% |
| 2018 | 0.3044 current US$ per square kilometre | -131.4% |
| 2019 | 0.073 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.0% |
| 2020 | -0.1065 current US$ per square kilometre | -246.0% |
| 2021 | 0.0442 current US$ per square kilometre | -141.4% |
| 2022 | 0.1207 current US$ per square kilometre | +173.3% |
| 2023 | 0.0453 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0021 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.8191 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4101 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.3754 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0157 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0259 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1065 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1207 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near China
- 110 Republic of Korea 0.1037 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 111 Uzbekistan 0.0805 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 112 Senegal 0.0554 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 114 Russian Federation 0.0421 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 115 Montenegro 0.0415 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 116 Papua New Guinea 0.0221 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for China
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 8.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 100,022 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada -11.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 216.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France -48.60 million current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -8.89 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -521.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in China?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in China was 0.0453 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 2.47 current US$ per square kilometre in 1987.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.97 current US$ per square kilometre in 2003.
- How does China rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- China ranks 113th out of 134 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 107.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.