Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Guatemala
8.91 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
9.46 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
51st
Zimbabwe rank
49th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Guatemala
  • Zimbabwe
020406080100197619992023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 9.46 current US$ per square kilometre against 8.91 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.55 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 51st and Zimbabwe ranks 49th of 134 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.4666 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2068 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2598 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre 13.16 current US$ per square kilometre 11.82 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 28.53 current US$ per square kilometre 56.15 current US$ per square kilometre 27.62 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 27.29 current US$ per square kilometre 31.4 current US$ per square kilometre 4.12 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 18.57 current US$ per square kilometre 65.64 current US$ per square kilometre 47.07 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 8.51 current US$ per square kilometre 12.97 current US$ per square kilometre 4.46 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Guatemala or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 9.46 current US$ per square kilometre against 8.91 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Guatemala and Zimbabwe?
0.55 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Guatemala ranks 51st and Zimbabwe ranks 49th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/zimbabwe/">Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,725 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.