Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Guatemala
Guatemala: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per was 8.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Guatemala, 1976–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Guatemala is 8.91 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 33.0% on the previous year and up 5,584.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Guatemala peaked at 99.2 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997 and was at its lowest, 0.1567 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2013.
Guatemala ranks 51st of 134 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1976 | 0.3733 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0.4666 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1978 | 0.3733 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1981 | 0.7465 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1982 | 2.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1983 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.2% |
| 1990 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1991 | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.0% |
| 1992 | 8.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +357.1% |
| 1993 | 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1994 | 9.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1995 | 15.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.6% |
| 1996 | 18.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 1997 | 99.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +445.1% |
| 1998 | 64.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.7% |
| 1999 | 55.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 2000 | 50.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2001 | 18.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.2% |
| 2002 | 17.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 2003 | 41.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +132.5% |
| 2004 | 34.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 2005 | 20.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.0% |
| 2006 | 34.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.7% |
| 2007 | 22.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.7% |
| 2008 | 18.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.9% |
| 2009 | 14.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.2% |
| 2010 | 24.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.7% |
| 2011 | 25.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2012 | 24.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2013 | 0.1567 current US$ per square kilometre | -99.4% |
| 2020 | 5.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +3619.9% |
| 2021 | 6.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2022 | 13.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +121.0% |
| 2023 | 8.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.4044 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3733 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4666 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 1980s | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7465 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 1990s | 28.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 99.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 27.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 50.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 18.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1567 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 2020s | 8.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 48 Togo 10.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 49 Zimbabwe 9.46 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 50 Croatia 9.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 52 Romania 8.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 53 Tunisia 8.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 54 Sudan 7.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Guatemala
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.46 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 27.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 3.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.87 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 4.31 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.70 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -158,126 current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Guatemala?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Guatemala was 8.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 99.2 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1567 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013.
- How does Guatemala rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- Guatemala ranks 51st out of 134 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5,584.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.