Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Somalia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Somalia
How they compare
Somalia currently reports 82 current US$ per square kilometre against 17.06 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 64.94 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Somalia's figure about 4.8 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 13th and Somalia ranks 14th of 46 groups.
Across the 6 decades both report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) averaged higher in 4 and Somalia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.066 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.35 current US$ per square kilometre | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) |
| 1980s | 7.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) |
| 1990s | 18.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.89 current US$ per square kilometre | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) |
| 2000s | 32.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.99 current US$ per square kilometre | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) |
| 2010s | 28.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 51.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.51 current US$ per square kilometre | Somalia |
| 2020s | 22.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 71.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 48.99 current US$ per square kilometre | Somalia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Somalia?
- Somalia, at 82 current US$ per square kilometre against 17.06 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Somalia?
- 64.94 current US$ per square kilometre, with Somalia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Somalia?
- 49 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2022.
- How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Somalia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 13th and Somalia ranks 14th of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.