Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per was 17.06 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) stood at 17.06 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 39.1% on the previous year and down 51.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) peaked at 46.7 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009 and was at its lowest, 0.7151 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1971.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 13th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.7999 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.7151 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1972 | 0.8896 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.4% |
| 1973 | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.8% |
| 1974 | 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.6% |
| 1975 | 2.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 1976 | 2.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1977 | 3.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.3% |
| 1978 | 4.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1979 | 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 1980 | 6.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.7% |
| 1981 | 3.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.6% |
| 1982 | 4.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 1983 | 5.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 1984 | 5.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1985 | 4.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.4% |
| 1986 | 9.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.0% |
| 1987 | 9.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1988 | 12.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.6% |
| 1989 | 12.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1990 | 13.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1991 | 15.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1992 | 16.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1993 | 16.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1994 | 16.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1995 | 18.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 1996 | 24.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.3% |
| 1997 | 20.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.5% |
| 1998 | 22.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1999 | 23.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2000 | 21.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2001 | 23.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2002 | 24.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2003 | 26.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2004 | 29.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 2005 | 32.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2006 | 35.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2007 | 42.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 2008 | 42.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2009 | 46.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2010 | 46.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2011 | 46.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2012 | 34.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.9% |
| 2013 | 29.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.3% |
| 2014 | 28.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2015 | 20.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.0% |
| 2016 | 21.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2017 | 20.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2018 | 20.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2019 | 21.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2020 | 21.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2021 | 28.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.8% |
| 2022 | 17.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7151 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 7.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 18.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 32.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 46.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 28.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 20.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 46.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 22.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- 10 Burkina Faso 153.66 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Latvia 122.78 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Kenya 88.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Ethiopia 85.28 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Somalia 82 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Slovakia 79.63 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Maldives 78.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 61.63 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 413.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.20 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.27 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 534.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.57 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.55 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.14 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 362.50 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.27 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) was 17.06 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The highest recorded value was 46.7 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.7151 current US$ per square kilometre in 1971.
- How does Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 13th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per rising or falling in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 51.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.