OECD members vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

OECD members
0.2749 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Tanzania
16.31 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
43rd
Tanzania rank
40th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • OECD members
  • Tanzania
050100150196519942023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 16.31 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.2749 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 16.04 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 59.3 times OECD members's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 43rd and Tanzania ranks 40th of 46 groups.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0311 current US$ per square kilometre 21.81 current US$ per square kilometre 21.77 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s -0.0014 current US$ per square kilometre 53.56 current US$ per square kilometre 53.56 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre 88.63 current US$ per square kilometre 87.61 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2000s 0.7541 current US$ per square kilometre 99.44 current US$ per square kilometre 98.69 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 0.2947 current US$ per square kilometre 87.33 current US$ per square kilometre 87.03 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 0.1451 current US$ per square kilometre 48.83 current US$ per square kilometre 48.69 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, OECD members or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 16.31 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.2749 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between OECD members and Tanzania?
16.04 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Tanzania?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do OECD members and Tanzania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
OECD members ranks 43rd and Tanzania ranks 40th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/tanzania/">OECD members vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,725 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.