Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in OECD members
OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per was 0.2749 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in OECD members, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in OECD members stood at 0.2749 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 151.6% on the previous year and up 448.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in OECD members peaked at 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999 and was at its lowest, -0.0125 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1987.
That places OECD members 43rd out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in OECD members, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.0671 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.0469 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.1% |
| 1972 | 0.0424 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 1973 | 0.0341 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 1974 | 0.0125 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.3% |
| 1975 | 0.0071 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.2% |
| 1976 | 0.008 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1977 | 0.0484 current US$ per square kilometre | +507.1% |
| 1978 | 0.0216 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.3% |
| 1979 | 0.0225 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1980 | 0.0043 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.0% |
| 1981 | 0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 1982 | 0.0085 current US$ per square kilometre | +130.8% |
| 1983 | 0.0054 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.7% |
| 1984 | -0.0085 current US$ per square kilometre | -257.9% |
| 1985 | -0.0043 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1986 | -0.0125 current US$ per square kilometre | +193.3% |
| 1987 | -0.0125 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1988 | -0.0023 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.8% |
| 1989 | 0.0046 current US$ per square kilometre | -300.0% |
| 1990 | 0.3428 current US$ per square kilometre | +7431.2% |
| 1991 | 0.7994 current US$ per square kilometre | +133.2% |
| 1992 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.0% |
| 1993 | 0.1246 current US$ per square kilometre | -90.1% |
| 1994 | 0.3826 current US$ per square kilometre | +207.0% |
| 1995 | 0.9829 current US$ per square kilometre | +156.9% |
| 1996 | 0.9384 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1997 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.5% |
| 1998 | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.4% |
| 1999 | 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.1% |
| 2000 | 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 2001 | 1.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.1% |
| 2002 | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 2003 | 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 2004 | 0.8813 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.6% |
| 2005 | 0.0324 current US$ per square kilometre | -96.3% |
| 2006 | 0.0113 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.2% |
| 2007 | 0.049 current US$ per square kilometre | +335.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0468 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 2009 | 0.0479 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2010 | 0.0372 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 2011 | 0.0256 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.1% |
| 2012 | 0.0502 current US$ per square kilometre | +95.6% |
| 2013 | 0.0327 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.8% |
| 2014 | 0.1107 current US$ per square kilometre | +238.8% |
| 2015 | 0.1623 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.6% |
| 2016 | 0.5127 current US$ per square kilometre | +215.9% |
| 2017 | 0.8465 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.1% |
| 2018 | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.3% |
| 2019 | 0.0324 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.2% |
| 2020 | 0.051 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.4% |
| 2021 | 0.1093 current US$ per square kilometre | +114.3% |
| 2022 | 0.2749 current US$ per square kilometre | +151.6% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in OECD members changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | +7431.2% | 0.0046 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3428 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1977 | +507.1% | 0.008 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0484 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0311 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0071 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0671 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.0014 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0125 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0085 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1246 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.7541 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0113 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.2947 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0256 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1451 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.051 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2749 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near OECD members
- 40 Tanzania 16.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Djibouti 16.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Singapore 14.93 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Mauritius 14.78 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Myanmar 14.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Hungary 12.72 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 46 Cambodia 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for OECD members
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 31.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 14.83 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 75.99 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.64 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 39.41 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 387.66 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 673.54 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 108.61 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 45.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 477.76 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in OECD members?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in OECD members was 0.2749 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in OECD members?
- The highest recorded value was 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in OECD members?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0125 current US$ per square kilometre in 1987.
- How does OECD members rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- OECD members ranks 43rd out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per rising or falling in OECD members?
- Over the last ten years it is up 448.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this OECD members data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.