Myanmar vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per

Myanmar
14.19 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
0.2749 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Myanmar rank
44th
OECD members rank
43rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per over time

  • Myanmar
  • OECD members
01020304050197019962023

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 14.19 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.2749 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 13.92 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 51.6 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Myanmar ahead.

Myanmar ranks 44th and OECD members ranks 43rd of 134 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 5 and OECD members in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 6.04 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0251 current US$ per square kilometre 6.02 current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar
1980s 4.54 current US$ per square kilometre -0.0014 current US$ per square kilometre 4.54 current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar
1990s 0.3948 current US$ per square kilometre 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre OECD members
2000s 7.99 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6541 current US$ per square kilometre 7.33 current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar
2010s 29.14 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2947 current US$ per square kilometre 28.84 current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar
2020s 29.93 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1451 current US$ per square kilometre 29.78 current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per, Myanmar or OECD members?
Myanmar, at 14.19 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.2749 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per between Myanmar and OECD members?
13.92 current US$ per square kilometre, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and OECD members?
41 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2022.
How do Myanmar and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
Myanmar ranks 44th and OECD members ranks 43rd of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/myanmar/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-per-square-kilometre/myanmar/oecd-members/">Myanmar vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 6,725 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.