Malawi vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Malawi
152.37 million current US$
in 2023
South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
1.06 billion current US$
in 2022
Malawi rank
29th
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Malawi
  • South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
0500.0M1.0B1.5B197019962023

How they compare

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) currently reports 1.06 billion current US$ against 152.37 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 904.40 million current US$.

That makes South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s figure about 6.9 times Malawi's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, South Asia (IDA & IBRD) has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 29th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 29th of 172 countries.

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi South Asia (IDA & IBRD) Difference Ahead
1970s 3.31 million current US$ 78.46 million current US$ 75.15 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
1980s 20.26 million current US$ 171.99 million current US$ 151.73 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
1990s 53.74 million current US$ 202.72 million current US$ 148.98 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2000s 76.04 million current US$ 533.89 million current US$ 457.85 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2010s 106.72 million current US$ 942.95 million current US$ 836.23 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2020s 98.13 million current US$ 1.05 billion current US$ 952.24 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Malawi or South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
South Asia (IDA & IBRD), at 1.06 billion current US$ against 152.37 million current US$ in Malawi as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Malawi and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
904.40 million current US$, with South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
52 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2022.
How do Malawi and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Malawi ranks 29th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 29th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-gaps-filled/malawi/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-gaps-filled/malawi/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/">Malawi vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 9,673 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) with 167 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.