Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 1.06 billion current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in South Asia (IDA & IBRD), 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) recorded 1.06 billion current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in 2022.
That represents a change of up 4.4% on the previous year and up 40.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in South Asia (IDA & IBRD) peaked at 1.29 billion current US$ in 2017 and was at its lowest, 9.54 million current US$, in 1970.
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 29th of 45 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in South Asia (IDA & IBRD), year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 9.54 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 21.21 million current US$ | +122.3% |
| 1972 | 30.93 million current US$ | +45.8% |
| 1973 | 52.15 million current US$ | +68.6% |
| 1974 | 104.90 million current US$ | +101.2% |
| 1975 | 197.86 million current US$ | +88.6% |
| 1976 | 43.71 million current US$ | -77.9% |
| 1977 | 95.36 million current US$ | +118.2% |
| 1978 | 80.02 million current US$ | -16.1% |
| 1979 | 79.97 million current US$ | -0.1% |
| 1980 | 139.27 million current US$ | +74.2% |
| 1981 | 251.40 million current US$ | +80.5% |
| 1982 | 174.01 million current US$ | -30.8% |
| 1983 | 144.94 million current US$ | -16.7% |
| 1984 | 175.31 million current US$ | +21.0% |
| 1985 | 97.56 million current US$ | -44.4% |
| 1986 | 103.21 million current US$ | +5.8% |
| 1987 | 168.20 million current US$ | +63.0% |
| 1988 | 221.22 million current US$ | +31.5% |
| 1989 | 244.80 million current US$ | +10.7% |
| 1990 | 156.50 million current US$ | -36.1% |
| 1991 | 134.11 million current US$ | -14.3% |
| 1992 | 191.79 million current US$ | +43.0% |
| 1993 | 166.55 million current US$ | -13.2% |
| 1994 | 169.05 million current US$ | +1.5% |
| 1995 | 228.78 million current US$ | +35.3% |
| 1996 | 300.93 million current US$ | +31.5% |
| 1997 | 269.46 million current US$ | -10.5% |
| 1998 | 212.53 million current US$ | -21.1% |
| 1999 | 197.50 million current US$ | -7.1% |
| 2000 | 200.64 million current US$ | +1.6% |
| 2001 | 273.26 million current US$ | +36.2% |
| 2002 | 337.71 million current US$ | +23.6% |
| 2003 | 390.93 million current US$ | +15.8% |
| 2004 | 492.97 million current US$ | +26.1% |
| 2005 | 595.19 million current US$ | +20.7% |
| 2006 | 650.91 million current US$ | +9.4% |
| 2007 | 668.15 million current US$ | +2.6% |
| 2008 | 895.52 million current US$ | +34.0% |
| 2009 | 833.67 million current US$ | -6.9% |
| 2010 | 841.88 million current US$ | +1.0% |
| 2011 | 945.11 million current US$ | +12.3% |
| 2012 | 751.47 million current US$ | -20.5% |
| 2013 | 730.63 million current US$ | -2.8% |
| 2014 | 737.42 million current US$ | +0.9% |
| 2015 | 828.18 million current US$ | +12.3% |
| 2016 | 1.10 billion current US$ | +33.0% |
| 2017 | 1.29 billion current US$ | +16.7% |
| 2018 | 1.25 billion current US$ | -2.4% |
| 2019 | 952.34 million current US$ | -24.1% |
| 2020 | 1.08 billion current US$ | +13.6% |
| 2021 | 1.01 billion current US$ | -6.4% |
| 2022 | 1.06 billion current US$ | +4.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 71.56 million current US$ | 9.54 million current US$ | 197.86 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 171.99 million current US$ | 97.56 million current US$ | 251.40 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 202.72 million current US$ | 134.11 million current US$ | 300.93 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 533.89 million current US$ | 200.64 million current US$ | 895.52 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 942.95 million current US$ | 730.63 million current US$ | 1.29 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.05 billion current US$ | 1.01 billion current US$ | 1.08 billion current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
- 26 North Macedonia 160.45 million current US$ compare
- 27 Russian Federation 160.07 million current US$ compare
- 28 Somalia 155.74 million current US$ compare
- 29 Malawi 152.37 million current US$ compare
- 30 Kenya 150.79 million current US$ compare
- 31 Niger 146.22 million current US$ compare
- 32 Mozambique 143.09 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 56.24 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 5.77 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 314.09 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 1.06 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 126.37 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 975.55 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 294.90 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 683.19 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 148.76 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 5.50 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in South Asia (IDA & IBRD) was 1.06 billion current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
- The highest recorded value was 1.29 billion current US$ in 2017.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.54 million current US$ in 1970.
- How does South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 29th out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 40.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Asia (IDA & IBRD) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) with 167 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) with 167 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.