Central Europe and the Baltics vs Estonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Central Europe and the Baltics
95.45 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Estonia
2,555 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
34th
Estonia rank
37th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Estonia
01.0k2.0k3.0k199020002010

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre against 95.45 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 2,460 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Estonia's figure about 26.8 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Central Europe and the Baltics has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 34th and Estonia ranks 37th of 45 groups.

Central Europe and the Baltics has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 826.73 current US$ per square kilometre 572.54 current US$ per square kilometre 254.19 current US$ per square kilometre Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 2,055 current US$ per square kilometre 1,339 current US$ per square kilometre 715.54 current US$ per square kilometre Central Europe and the Baltics

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Central Europe and the Baltics or Estonia?
Estonia, at 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre against 95.45 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Central Europe and the Baltics and Estonia?
2,460 current US$ per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Estonia?
13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Estonia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 34th and Estonia ranks 37th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Estonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/central-europe-and-the-baltics/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/central-europe-and-the-baltics/estonia/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Estonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.