Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Estonia
Estonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Estonia, 1992–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2004, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Estonia stood at 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 13 years on record.
That represents a change of up 81.3% on the previous year and up 1,250.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Estonia peaked at 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004 and was at its lowest, 158.29 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1993.
That places Estonia 37th out of 170 countries with data for 2004, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Estonia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 331.45 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 158.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.2% |
| 1994 | 189.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 1995 | 388.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +105.4% |
| 1996 | 486.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.3% |
| 1997 | 635.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.6% |
| 1998 | 1,133 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.2% |
| 1999 | 1,258 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 2000 | 914.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.3% |
| 2001 | 972.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2002 | 845.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 2003 | 1,410 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.6% |
| 2004 | 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 572.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 158.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,258 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 1,339 current US$ per square kilometre | 845.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
Countries ranked near Estonia
- 34 Singapore 2,791 current US$ per square kilometre
- 35 Armenia 2,766 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Hungary 2,654 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Burundi 2,494 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Jordan 2,435 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Slovenia 2,422 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Estonia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 140,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 50,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 400,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 108.30 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 80,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 4.54 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.26 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 50,000 current US$ (2003)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 140,000 current US$ (2003)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 790,000 current US$ (2004)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Estonia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Estonia was 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Estonia?
- The highest recorded value was 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Estonia?
- The lowest recorded value was 158.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993.
- How does Estonia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Estonia ranks 37th out of 170 countries with data for 2004.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Estonia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,250.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Estonia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.