Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Burundi
Burundi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 2,494 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
2,494 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 38.7%
World rank
38th
of 170 countries
All-time high
5,109 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
All-time low
-24.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1998
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Burundi, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Burundi stood at 2,494 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 38.7% on the previous year and down 14.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Burundi peaked at 5,109 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, -24.53 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1998.
Burundi ranks 38th of 170 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Burundi, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 18.3 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 29.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.6% |
| 1963 | 9.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 1964 | 52.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +444.0% |
| 1965 | 30.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.9% |
| 1966 | 49.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.5% |
| 1967 | 57.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 1968 | 58.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1969 | 84.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.4% |
| 1970 | 116.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.7% |
| 1971 | 173.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.7% |
| 1972 | 209.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 1973 | 295.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.5% |
| 1974 | 372.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1975 | 493.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.4% |
| 1976 | 413.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 1977 | 186.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.0% |
| 1978 | 296.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.4% |
| 1979 | 504.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.1% |
| 1980 | 468.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1981 | 992.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +111.6% |
| 1982 | 278.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.9% |
| 1983 | 487.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.0% |
| 1984 | 387.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.5% |
| 1985 | 371.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1986 | 434.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 1987 | 396.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 1988 | 1,064 current US$ per square kilometre | +168.1% |
| 1989 | 1,382 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 1990 | 1,390 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1991 | 2,211 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.0% |
| 1992 | 2,560 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 1993 | 934.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.5% |
| 1994 | 1,421 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.1% |
| 1995 | 929.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.6% |
| 1996 | 385.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.5% |
| 1997 | 110.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.2% |
| 1998 | -24.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -122.1% |
| 1999 | 55.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -327.0% |
| 2000 | 356.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +540.6% |
| 2001 | 2,436 current US$ per square kilometre | +583.0% |
| 2002 | 1,419 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.8% |
| 2003 | 1,861 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 2004 | 2,689 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.5% |
| 2005 | 3,314 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.2% |
| 2006 | 1,833 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.7% |
| 2007 | 4,739 current US$ per square kilometre | +158.6% |
| 2008 | 3,296 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.5% |
| 2009 | 5,103 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.8% |
| 2010 | 5,109 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2011 | 3,407 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 2012 | 2,288 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.8% |
| 2013 | 2,927 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.9% |
| 2014 | 3,705 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.6% |
| 2015 | 1,894 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.9% |
| 2016 | 2,266 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 2017 | 1,721 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.1% |
| 2018 | 1,907 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 2019 | 4,304 current US$ per square kilometre | +125.7% |
| 2020 | 2,197 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.0% |
| 2021 | 2,639 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.1% |
| 2022 | 4,070 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.2% |
| 2023 | 2,494 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 43.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 84.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 306.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 116.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 504.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 626.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 278.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,382 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 997.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,560 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2,705 current US$ per square kilometre | 356.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 5,103 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2,953 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,721 current US$ per square kilometre | 5,109 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2,850 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,197 current US$ per square kilometre | 4,070 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Burundi
- 35 Armenia 2,766 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Hungary 2,654 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Estonia 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Jordan 2,435 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Slovenia 2,422 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Rwanda 2,307 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Burundi
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 142,904 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 27.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 64.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 10.83 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 18.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 20.86 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 23,544 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 20.08 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Burundi?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Burundi was 2,494 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Burundi?
- The highest recorded value was 5,109 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Burundi?
- The lowest recorded value was -24.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 1998.
- How does Burundi rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Burundi ranks 38th out of 170 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Burundi?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Burundi data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.