Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Rwanda
Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 2,307 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
2,307 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 30.4%
World rank
41st
of 170 countries
All-time high
6,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
All-time low
19.05 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Rwanda, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Rwanda stood at 2,307 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 30.4% on the previous year and down 52.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Rwanda peaked at 6,000 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017 and was at its lowest, 19.05 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Rwanda ranks 41st of 170 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Rwanda, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 19.05 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 30.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.6% |
| 1963 | 25.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.7% |
| 1964 | 34.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.4% |
| 1965 | 42.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 1966 | 65.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.8% |
| 1967 | 70.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1968 | 152.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +117.3% |
| 1969 | 95.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 1970 | 117.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 1971 | 132.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1972 | 147.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 1973 | 281.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.9% |
| 1974 | 259.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 1975 | 681.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +163.1% |
| 1976 | 329.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.7% |
| 1977 | 449.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.5% |
| 1978 | 914.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +103.7% |
| 1979 | 976.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1980 | 866.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 1981 | 791.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 1982 | 693.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 1983 | 356.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.7% |
| 1984 | 623.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +74.9% |
| 1985 | 473.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.0% |
| 1986 | 787.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.3% |
| 1987 | 834.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1988 | 1,583 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.8% |
| 1989 | 1,319 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1990 | 1,459 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1991 | 865.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.7% |
| 1992 | 3,344 current US$ per square kilometre | +286.2% |
| 1993 | 1,460 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.3% |
| 1994 | 1,848 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.6% |
| 1995 | 726.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.7% |
| 1996 | 2,246 current US$ per square kilometre | +209.3% |
| 1997 | 1,866 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 1998 | 1,082 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.0% |
| 1999 | 1,585 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.5% |
| 2000 | 1,999 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 2001 | 1,816 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 2002 | 1,672 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 2003 | 2,189 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 2004 | 2,671 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 2005 | 3,688 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.1% |
| 2006 | 2,636 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.5% |
| 2007 | 3,183 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.8% |
| 2008 | 4,285 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.6% |
| 2009 | 4,236 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2010 | 4,230 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2011 | 3,716 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 2012 | 3,618 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2013 | 4,839 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.8% |
| 2014 | 3,768 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.1% |
| 2015 | 931.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.3% |
| 2016 | 4,442 current US$ per square kilometre | +377.0% |
| 2017 | 6,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.1% |
| 2018 | 3,743 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.6% |
| 2019 | 2,908 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.3% |
| 2020 | 2,918 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2021 | 2,722 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2022 | 1,769 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.0% |
| 2023 | 2,307 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 59.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 152.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 429.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 117.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 976.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 832.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 356.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,583 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1,648 current US$ per square kilometre | 726.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,344 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2,837 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,672 current US$ per square kilometre | 4,285 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 3,820 current US$ per square kilometre | 931.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 6,000 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2,429 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,769 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,918 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Rwanda
- 38 Burundi 2,494 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Jordan 2,435 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Slovenia 2,422 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Latvia 2,146 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2,134 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Tonga 1,938 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Rwanda
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 329,220 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 38.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 56.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 10.29 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 77.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 83.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 22.70 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 3.03 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 22.16 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Rwanda?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Rwanda was 2,307 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Rwanda?
- The highest recorded value was 6,000 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Rwanda?
- The lowest recorded value was 19.05 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Rwanda rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Rwanda ranks 41st out of 170 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Rwanda?
- Over the last ten years it is down 52.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Rwanda data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.