Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Latvia
Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 2,146 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Latvia, 1992–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2004, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Latvia stood at 2,146 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 13 years on record.
That represents a change of up 74.8% on the previous year and up 985.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Latvia peaked at 2,146 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004 and was at its lowest, 158.93 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1993.
Latvia ranks 42nd of 170 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Latvia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 355.15 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 158.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.2% |
| 1994 | 197.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.4% |
| 1995 | 270.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.1% |
| 1996 | 429.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.5% |
| 1997 | 479.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1998 | 764.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.4% |
| 1999 | 806.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2000 | 836.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2001 | 841.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2002 | 743.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 2003 | 1,228 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.0% |
| 2004 | 2,146 current US$ per square kilometre | +74.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 432.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 158.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 806.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 1,159 current US$ per square kilometre | 743.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,146 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 39 Jordan 2,435 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Slovenia 2,422 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Rwanda 2,307 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2,134 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Tonga 1,938 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Croatia 1,883 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latvia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 110,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 60,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 133.54 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 110,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 5.99 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.98 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 100,000 current US$ (2003)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 820,000 current US$ (2003)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 690,000 current US$ (2004)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Latvia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Latvia was 2,146 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 2,146 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 158.93 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993.
- How does Latvia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Latvia ranks 42nd out of 170 countries with data for 2004.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 985.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.