Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Chile
6.89 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Equatorial Guinea
7.19 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
153rd
Equatorial Guinea rank
152nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Chile
  • Equatorial Guinea
0100200300197119972023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 7.19 current US$ per square kilometre against 6.89 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.3 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Chile ranks 153rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 152nd of 170 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 0.6456 current US$ per square kilometre 14.97 current US$ per square kilometre 14.33 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre 153.87 current US$ per square kilometre 148.92 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 16.83 current US$ per square kilometre 108.38 current US$ per square kilometre 91.54 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 15.18 current US$ per square kilometre 111.27 current US$ per square kilometre 96.08 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 29.05 current US$ per square kilometre 10.74 current US$ per square kilometre 18.31 current US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Chile or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 7.19 current US$ per square kilometre against 6.89 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Chile and Equatorial Guinea?
0.3 current US$ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Equatorial Guinea?
32 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2017.
How do Chile and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Chile ranks 153rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 152nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/chile/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/chile/equatorial-guinea/">Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.