Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Chile
Chile: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 6.89 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Chile, 1971–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Chile is 6.89 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2017.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 6.4% on the previous year and down 59.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Chile peaked at 127.77 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.0134 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1971.
Chile ranks 153rd of 170 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Chile, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 0.0134 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0.3497 current US$ per square kilometre | +2500.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0269 current US$ per square kilometre | -92.3% |
| 1974 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +6400.0% |
| 1975 | 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.8% |
| 1976 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.9% |
| 1977 | 5.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +337.1% |
| 1978 | 18.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +246.3% |
| 1979 | 0.6456 current US$ per square kilometre | -96.4% |
| 1985 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +97.9% |
| 1986 | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.8% |
| 1987 | 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +193.7% |
| 1988 | 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.2% |
| 1989 | 17.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +649.1% |
| 1990 | 27.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.3% |
| 1991 | 16.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.0% |
| 1992 | 17.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1993 | 23.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1994 | 22.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 1995 | 16.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.7% |
| 1996 | 13.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 1997 | 15.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 1998 | 8.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.9% |
| 1999 | 5.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.4% |
| 2000 | 7.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 2001 | 10.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.8% |
| 2002 | 9.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 2003 | 14.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.5% |
| 2004 | 22.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.0% |
| 2005 | 31.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.6% |
| 2006 | 16.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.2% |
| 2007 | 16.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2008 | 8.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.4% |
| 2009 | 14.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.2% |
| 2010 | 21.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.5% |
| 2011 | 127.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +488.2% |
| 2012 | 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.0% |
| 2013 | 7.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +204.6% |
| 2014 | 59.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +649.0% |
| 2015 | 8.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.2% |
| 2016 | 7.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 2017 | 6.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 3.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0134 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1980s | 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1990s | 16.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 15.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 30.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 127.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 150 Thailand 9.65 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 151 Peru 8.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 152 Equatorial Guinea 7.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 154 Uruguay 6.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 155 Argentina 6.17 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 156 Gabon 5.59 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Chile
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 399,452 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 198,376 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.14 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.12 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 213,829 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.63 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.37 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.83 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 160,400 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 2.79 million current US$ (2017)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Chile?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Chile was 6.89 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 127.77 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0134 current US$ per square kilometre in 1971.
- How does Chile rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Chile ranks 153rd out of 170 countries with data for 2017.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 59.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 42 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.