Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Chile
Chile: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 0.1503 current US$ per person in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Chile, 1960–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per person.
Analysis
In 2017, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Chile stood at 0.1503 current US$ per person.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 18.3% on the previous year and down 71.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Chile peaked at 4.32 current US$ per person in 1995 and was at its lowest, -2.5 current US$ per person, in 2002.
That places Chile 134th out of 173 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Chile, year by year
| Year | current US$ per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0.0012 current US$ per person | — |
| 1961 | 0.0012 current US$ per person | -2.1% |
| 1962 | 0.0024 current US$ per person | +95.9% |
| 1963 | 0.0035 current US$ per person | +47.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0045 current US$ per person | +30.7% |
| 1965 | 0.1209 current US$ per person | +2573.5% |
| 1966 | 0.4912 current US$ per person | +306.2% |
| 1967 | 0.0492 current US$ per person | -90.0% |
| 1968 | -0.0526 current US$ per person | -206.8% |
| 1969 | -0.2459 current US$ per person | +367.9% |
| 1970 | -0.2925 current US$ per person | +19.0% |
| 1971 | 0.009 current US$ per person | -103.1% |
| 1972 | 0.0098 current US$ per person | +9.3% |
| 1973 | 0.1296 current US$ per person | +1218.5% |
| 1974 | 0.772 current US$ per person | +495.7% |
| 1975 | 0.1162 current US$ per person | -84.9% |
| 1976 | 0.1181 current US$ per person | +1.6% |
| 1977 | 0.1954 current US$ per person | +65.4% |
| 1978 | 0.0949 current US$ per person | -51.4% |
| 1979 | 0.6402 current US$ per person | +574.8% |
| 1980 | 0.2172 current US$ per person | -66.1% |
| 1981 | 0.1593 current US$ per person | -26.7% |
| 1982 | 0.3688 current US$ per person | +131.5% |
| 1983 | 0.3401 current US$ per person | -7.8% |
| 1984 | 0.1368 current US$ per person | -59.8% |
| 1985 | 0.5429 current US$ per person | +296.9% |
| 1986 | 0.4305 current US$ per person | -20.7% |
| 1987 | 0.7568 current US$ per person | +75.8% |
| 1988 | 1.15 current US$ per person | +52.2% |
| 1989 | 1.38 current US$ per person | +20.1% |
| 1990 | 1.39 current US$ per person | +0.7% |
| 1991 | 1.31 current US$ per person | -6.2% |
| 1992 | 1.31 current US$ per person | +0.7% |
| 1993 | 2.05 current US$ per person | +55.7% |
| 1994 | 2.19 current US$ per person | +7.1% |
| 1995 | 4.32 current US$ per person | +97.0% |
| 1996 | 3.59 current US$ per person | -16.9% |
| 1997 | 2.89 current US$ per person | -19.4% |
| 1998 | 2.16 current US$ per person | -25.4% |
| 1999 | 1.55 current US$ per person | -28.1% |
| 2000 | 1.38 current US$ per person | -11.1% |
| 2001 | 1.39 current US$ per person | +1.2% |
| 2002 | -2.5 current US$ per person | -279.1% |
| 2003 | 0.4412 current US$ per person | -117.7% |
| 2004 | -2.14 current US$ per person | -584.2% |
| 2005 | 0.6465 current US$ per person | -130.3% |
| 2006 | 0.4894 current US$ per person | -24.3% |
| 2007 | 0.5248 current US$ per person | +7.2% |
| 2008 | 0.3919 current US$ per person | -25.3% |
| 2009 | 0.4644 current US$ per person | +18.5% |
| 2010 | 0.926 current US$ per person | +99.4% |
| 2011 | 0.2403 current US$ per person | -74.0% |
| 2012 | 0.3568 current US$ per person | +48.4% |
| 2013 | 0.2047 current US$ per person | -42.6% |
| 2014 | 0.1635 current US$ per person | -20.1% |
| 2015 | 0.1507 current US$ per person | -7.8% |
| 2016 | 0.127 current US$ per person | -15.7% |
| 2017 | 0.1503 current US$ per person | +18.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0376 current US$ per person | -0.2459 current US$ per person | 0.4912 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.1793 current US$ per person | -0.2925 current US$ per person | 0.772 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.5487 current US$ per person | 0.1368 current US$ per person | 1.38 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.28 current US$ per person | 1.31 current US$ per person | 4.32 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1097 current US$ per person | -2.5 current US$ per person | 1.39 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.2899 current US$ per person | 0.127 current US$ per person | 0.926 current US$ per person | 8 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 131 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 0.1868 current US$ per person compare
- 132 Kuwait 0.1844 current US$ per person compare
- 133 Czechia 0.1677 current US$ per person compare
- 135 Angola 0.1485 current US$ per person compare
- 136 Slovenia 0.1404 current US$ per person compare
- 137 New Caledonia 0.1373 current US$ per person compare
More aid effectiveness data for Chile
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 399,452 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 198,376 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.14 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.12 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 213,829 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.63 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.37 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.83 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 160,400 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 2.79 million current US$ (2017)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Chile?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Chile was 0.1503 current US$ per person in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 4.32 current US$ per person in 1995.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.5 current US$ per person in 2002.
- How does Chile rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- Chile ranks 134th out of 173 countries with data for 2017.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 71.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 58 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.