Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Chile
Chile: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 3.76 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Chile, 1961–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Chile recorded 3.76 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in 2017.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 20.2% on the previous year and down 68.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Chile peaked at 84.39 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995 and was at its lowest, -53.22 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2002.
That places Chile 137th out of 171 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Chile, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0134 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0269 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0403 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0538 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1965 | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +2625.0% |
| 1966 | 6.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +313.8% |
| 1967 | 0.6187 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.8% |
| 1968 | -0.6725 current US$ per square kilometre | -208.7% |
| 1969 | -3.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +376.0% |
| 1970 | -3.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 1971 | 0.121 current US$ per square kilometre | -103.1% |
| 1972 | 0.1345 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1973 | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +1240.0% |
| 1974 | 10.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +505.2% |
| 1975 | 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.7% |
| 1976 | 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1977 | 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.0% |
| 1978 | 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.7% |
| 1979 | 9.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +584.9% |
| 1980 | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.6% |
| 1981 | 2.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.6% |
| 1982 | 5.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +134.9% |
| 1983 | 5.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1984 | 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.2% |
| 1985 | 9.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +303.0% |
| 1986 | 7.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 1987 | 13.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.6% |
| 1988 | 20.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.6% |
| 1989 | 24.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 1990 | 25.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1991 | 23.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1992 | 24.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1993 | 38.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.2% |
| 1994 | 42.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1995 | 84.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +99.9% |
| 1996 | 71.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 1997 | 58.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 1998 | 43.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.5% |
| 1999 | 31.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.2% |
| 2000 | 28.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 2001 | 29.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2002 | -53.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -281.1% |
| 2003 | 9.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -117.9% |
| 2004 | -46.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -589.1% |
| 2005 | 14.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -130.6% |
| 2006 | 10.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.6% |
| 2007 | 11.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2008 | 8.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.6% |
| 2009 | 10.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 2010 | 21.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +101.4% |
| 2011 | 5.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.8% |
| 2012 | 8.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.9% |
| 2013 | 4.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.1% |
| 2014 | 3.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.1% |
| 2015 | 3.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 2016 | 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 2017 | 3.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4902 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 2.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 9.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 44.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 84.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 134 Oman 4.85 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 135 Angola 4.38 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 136 Colombia 3.89 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 138 Mongolia 3.23 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 139 Libya 3.09 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 140 French Polynesia 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Chile
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 399,452 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 198,376 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.14 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.12 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 213,829 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.63 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.37 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.83 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 160,400 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 2.79 million current US$ (2017)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Chile?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Chile was 3.76 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 84.39 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -53.22 current US$ per square kilometre in 2002.
- How does Chile rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- Chile ranks 137th out of 171 countries with data for 2017.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 68.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.