Czechia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Czechia
3,032 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
130.99 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Czechia rank
31st
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Czechia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019962022

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 3,032 current US$ per square kilometre against 130.99 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 2,901 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Czechia's figure about 23.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 31st and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 29th of 170 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1990s 1,839 current US$ per square kilometre 74.93 current US$ per square kilometre 1,765 current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2000s 3,238 current US$ per square kilometre 88.54 current US$ per square kilometre 3,149 current US$ per square kilometre Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Czechia or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Czechia, at 3,032 current US$ per square kilometre against 130.99 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Czechia and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
2,901 current US$ per square kilometre, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
12 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2004.
How do Czechia and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Czechia ranks 31st and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 29th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/czechia/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/czechia/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Czechia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.