Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 130.99 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) recorded 130.99 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 7.7% on the previous year and down 25.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 214.97 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 6.43 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1970.
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 29th of 45 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 6.43 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 7.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.1% |
| 1972 | 6.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 1973 | 10.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.4% |
| 1974 | 15.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.6% |
| 1975 | 18.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1976 | 14.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.3% |
| 1977 | 14.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1978 | 23.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.3% |
| 1979 | 32.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 1980 | 29.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1981 | 36.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.1% |
| 1982 | 28.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.4% |
| 1983 | 25.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 1984 | 32.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.8% |
| 1985 | 30.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 1986 | 39.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.0% |
| 1987 | 38.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1988 | 65.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.8% |
| 1989 | 68.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1990 | 74.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1991 | 79.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1992 | 111.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.4% |
| 1993 | 77.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.5% |
| 1994 | 87.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1995 | 80.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1996 | 74.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 1997 | 66.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 1998 | 72.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1999 | 65.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2000 | 49.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.4% |
| 2001 | 75.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.5% |
| 2002 | 81.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2003 | 108.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.1% |
| 2004 | 127.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 2005 | 142.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2006 | 151.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2007 | 184.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 2008 | 214.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 2009 | 186.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 2010 | 201.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2011 | 187.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 2012 | 175.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 2013 | 171.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2014 | 187.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2015 | 152.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 2016 | 160.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2017 | 174.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2018 | 171.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2019 | 148.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 2020 | 183.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.6% |
| 2021 | 141.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.8% |
| 2022 | 130.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 14.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 39.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 68.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 79.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 65.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 111.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 132.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 49.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 214.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 173.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 148.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 201.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 152.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 130.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 183.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 26 Poland 3,594 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Slovakia 3,501 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Lithuania 3,476 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Bulgaria 3,261 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Saint Lucia 3,078 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Czechia 3,032 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Romania 3,021 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 57.53 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 427.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.14 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.13 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 511.02 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.46 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.18 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.07 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 306.28 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.26 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) was 130.99 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 214.97 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was 6.43 current US$ per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 29th out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 25.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.