Poland vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Poland
3,594 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
130.99 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Poland rank
26th
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Poland
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197019962022

How they compare

Poland currently reports 3,594 current US$ per square kilometre against 130.99 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 3,463 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 27.4 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 26th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 29th of 170 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1990s 859.3 current US$ per square kilometre 79.06 current US$ per square kilometre 780.25 current US$ per square kilometre Poland
2000s 2,367 current US$ per square kilometre 88.54 current US$ per square kilometre 2,279 current US$ per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Poland or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Poland, at 3,594 current US$ per square kilometre against 130.99 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Poland and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
3,463 current US$ per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
How do Poland and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Poland ranks 26th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 29th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/poland/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/poland/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Poland vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.