Eswatini vs Türkiye: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Eswatini
782.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Türkiye
822.57 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
60th
Türkiye rank
59th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Eswatini
  • Türkiye
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196519942023

How they compare

Türkiye currently reports 822.57 current US$ per square kilometre against 782.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 40.5 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Türkiye's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 60th and Türkiye ranks 59th of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Türkiye in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Türkiye Difference Ahead
1970s 152.25 current US$ per square kilometre 37.06 current US$ per square kilometre 115.19 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 262.38 current US$ per square kilometre 18.68 current US$ per square kilometre 243.7 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 440.76 current US$ per square kilometre 35.35 current US$ per square kilometre 405.41 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 583.02 current US$ per square kilometre 450.11 current US$ per square kilometre 132.91 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 1,375 current US$ per square kilometre 2,313 current US$ per square kilometre 938.06 current US$ per square kilometre Türkiye
2020s 1,142 current US$ per square kilometre 407.18 current US$ per square kilometre 734.88 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Eswatini or Türkiye?
Türkiye, at 822.57 current US$ per square kilometre against 782.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Eswatini and Türkiye?
40.5 current US$ per square kilometre, with Türkiye ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Türkiye?
52 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Türkiye rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Eswatini ranks 60th and Türkiye ranks 59th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Türkiye: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/eswatini/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/eswatini/turkiye/">Eswatini vs Türkiye: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.