Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Türkiye
Türkiye: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 822.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
822.57 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 1,243.2%
World rank
59th
of 170 countries
All-time high
3,787 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2012
All-time low
-167.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Years of data
58
1965–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Türkiye, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Türkiye recorded 822.57 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in 2023.
The figure is up 1,243.2% on the previous year and down 74.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Türkiye peaked at 3,787 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, -167.53 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2020.
Türkiye ranks 59th of 170 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Türkiye, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 0.2729 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 8.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +3028.6% |
| 1967 | 29.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +240.6% |
| 1968 | 35.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 1969 | 4.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.3% |
| 1970 | 6.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.7% |
| 1971 | 8.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.3% |
| 1972 | 5.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.2% |
| 1973 | 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.7% |
| 1975 | 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1976 | 87.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +6231.1% |
| 1977 | 48.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.4% |
| 1978 | 8.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -82.4% |
| 1979 | 135.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +1497.4% |
| 1980 | -2.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -102.0% |
| 1981 | 30.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -1244.4% |
| 1982 | 14.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.9% |
| 1983 | 36.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.9% |
| 1984 | 22.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 1985 | 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.4% |
| 1986 | 94.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +1605.6% |
| 1987 | 11.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.2% |
| 1988 | -1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -113.7% |
| 1989 | -23.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +1445.3% |
| 1990 | -31.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.5% |
| 1991 | 266.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -956.2% |
| 1992 | -30.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -111.6% |
| 1993 | -23.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.9% |
| 1994 | -30.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.6% |
| 1995 | -17 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.9% |
| 1996 | 7.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -145.3% |
| 1997 | 78.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +925.0% |
| 1998 | 106.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.8% |
| 1999 | 26.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.2% |
| 2000 | 242.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +817.8% |
| 2001 | 185.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.6% |
| 2002 | 195.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2003 | 182.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 2004 | 393.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +115.9% |
| 2005 | 509.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.3% |
| 2006 | 498.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2007 | 706.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.9% |
| 2008 | 564.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.1% |
| 2009 | 1,022 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.1% |
| 2010 | 383.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.5% |
| 2011 | 3,624 current US$ per square kilometre | +845.1% |
| 2012 | 3,787 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2013 | 3,240 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 2014 | 3,506 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 2015 | 2,343 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.2% |
| 2016 | 3,450 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.3% |
| 2017 | 2,088 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.5% |
| 2018 | 573.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.5% |
| 2019 | 133.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.7% |
| 2020 | -167.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -225.5% |
| 2021 | 912.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -644.6% |
| 2022 | 61.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.3% |
| 2023 | 822.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +1243.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2729 current US$ per square kilometre | 35.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 33.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 135.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1980s | 18.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 94.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 35.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 266.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 450.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 182.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,022 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2,313 current US$ per square kilometre | 133.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,787 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 407.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -167.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 912.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Türkiye
- 56 Cyprus 972.94 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 57 Palau 939.41 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 58 Grenada 824.95 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 60 Eswatini 782.07 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 61 El Salvador 770.85 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 62 Hong Kong, China 761.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Türkiye
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 35.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 8.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 22.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 633.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 7.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 38.30 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 30.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 42.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 33.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 31.67 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Türkiye?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Türkiye was 822.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Türkiye?
- The highest recorded value was 3,787 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Türkiye?
- The lowest recorded value was -167.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020.
- How does Türkiye rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Türkiye ranks 59th out of 170 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Türkiye?
- Over the last ten years it is down 74.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Türkiye data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 58 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.