Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
168.32 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Lithuania
3,476 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
27th
Lithuania rank
28th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Lithuania
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019962022

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 3,476 current US$ per square kilometre against 168.32 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 3,308 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 20.6 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 27th and Lithuania ranks 28th of 45 groups.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 85.25 current US$ per square kilometre 594.79 current US$ per square kilometre 509.53 current US$ per square kilometre Lithuania
2000s 102.62 current US$ per square kilometre 2,430 current US$ per square kilometre 2,327 current US$ per square kilometre Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 3,476 current US$ per square kilometre against 168.32 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
3,308 current US$ per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 27th and Lithuania ranks 28th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lithuania/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.