Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 168.32 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) is 168.32 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 11.9% on the previous year and down 14.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) peaked at 257.88 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 7.59 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1970.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 27th of 45 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 7.59 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 9.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 1972 | 7.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 1973 | 11.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.0% |
| 1974 | 18.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.0% |
| 1975 | 22.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1976 | 17.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.2% |
| 1977 | 16.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1978 | 26.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.4% |
| 1979 | 38.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.4% |
| 1980 | 34.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 1981 | 41.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 1982 | 33.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 1983 | 30.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 1984 | 37.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 1985 | 36.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 1986 | 47.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.9% |
| 1987 | 44.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1988 | 74.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.8% |
| 1989 | 78.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1990 | 82.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1991 | 89.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1992 | 125.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.5% |
| 1993 | 77.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.5% |
| 1994 | 90.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1995 | 88.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1996 | 82.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 1997 | 70.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 1998 | 78.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1999 | 69.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 2000 | 52.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.9% |
| 2001 | 82.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.3% |
| 2002 | 93.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 2003 | 133.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.0% |
| 2004 | 151.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 2005 | 164.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2006 | 183.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2007 | 222.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.3% |
| 2008 | 257.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 2009 | 229.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 2010 | 247.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2011 | 221.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 2012 | 196.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 2013 | 189.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 2014 | 214.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 2015 | 168.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 2016 | 191.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 2017 | 196.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2018 | 218.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 2019 | 183.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 2020 | 219.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 2021 | 191.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 2022 | 168.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 17.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 38.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 45.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 78.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 85.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 69.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 125.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 157.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 52.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 257.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 202.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 168.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 247.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 192.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 168.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 219.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- 24 Georgia 4,231 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Comoros 3,910 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Poland 3,594 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Slovakia 3,501 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Lithuania 3,476 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Bulgaria 3,261 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Saint Lucia 3,078 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 61.63 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 413.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.20 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.27 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 534.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.57 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.55 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.14 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 362.50 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.27 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) was 168.32 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The highest recorded value was 257.88 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The lowest recorded value was 7.59 current US$ per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 27th out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.