Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
168.32 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Poland
3,594 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
27th
Poland rank
26th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Poland
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197019962022

How they compare

Poland currently reports 3,594 current US$ per square kilometre against 168.32 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 3,426 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 21.4 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 27th and Poland ranks 26th of 45 groups.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 85.42 current US$ per square kilometre 859.3 current US$ per square kilometre 773.88 current US$ per square kilometre Poland
2000s 102.62 current US$ per square kilometre 2,367 current US$ per square kilometre 2,265 current US$ per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Poland?
Poland, at 3,594 current US$ per square kilometre against 168.32 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Poland?
3,426 current US$ per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Poland?
15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Poland rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 27th and Poland ranks 26th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/poland/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.