Low & middle income vs Macao: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC … square European Union institutions
Low & middle income
477.29 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macao
18,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1998
Low & middle income rank
7th
Macao rank
8th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC … square European Union institutions over time
- Low & middle income
- Macao
How they compare
Macao currently reports 18,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 477.29 current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 17,523 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Macao's figure about 37.7 times Low & middle income's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.
Low & middle income ranks 7th and Macao ranks 8th of 45 groups.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Low & middle income or Macao?
- Macao, at 18,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 477.29 current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 1998.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Low & middle income and Macao?
- 17,523 current US$ per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Macao?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 1998.
- How do Low & middle income and Macao rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Low & middle income ranks 7th and Macao ranks 8th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.