Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Low & middle income
Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 477.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
477.29 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 38.6%
Rank
7th
of 45 groups
All-time high
477.29 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.2481 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Low & middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Low & middle income stood at 477.29 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 38.6% on the previous year and up 140.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Low & middle income peaked at 477.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.2481 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Low & middle income ranks 7th of 45 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Low & middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.2481 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.7924 current US$ per square kilometre | +219.4% |
| 1963 | 0.9531 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 1964 | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 1965 | 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.6% |
| 1966 | 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 1967 | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1968 | 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.4% |
| 1969 | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.3% |
| 1970 | 2.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.0% |
| 1971 | 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 1972 | 3.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1973 | 4.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.9% |
| 1974 | 7.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.6% |
| 1975 | 9.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.9% |
| 1976 | 6.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.9% |
| 1977 | 7.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 1978 | 11.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.3% |
| 1979 | 16.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.3% |
| 1980 | 14.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 1981 | 19.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.8% |
| 1982 | 15.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.6% |
| 1983 | 15.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1984 | 16.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1985 | 17.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1986 | 19.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1987 | 22.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 1988 | 33.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.6% |
| 1989 | 34.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1990 | 34.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1991 | 47.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.2% |
| 1992 | 52.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1993 | 49.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1994 | 58.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 1995 | 61.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1996 | 68.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1997 | 67.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1998 | 66.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1999 | 64.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2000 | 57.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2001 | 71.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.8% |
| 2002 | 66.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 2003 | 83.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2004 | 105.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 2005 | 112.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2006 | 125.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2007 | 144.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 2008 | 163.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 2009 | 170.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2010 | 161.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 2011 | 222.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.5% |
| 2012 | 216.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2013 | 198.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 2014 | 208.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2015 | 171.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 2016 | 210.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.9% |
| 2017 | 202.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 2018 | 209.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2019 | 187.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2020 | 262.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.1% |
| 2021 | 261.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2022 | 344.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.9% |
| 2023 | 477.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2481 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 7.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 21.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 57.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 68.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 110.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 57.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 170.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 198.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 161.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 222.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 336.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 261.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 477.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low & middle income
- 4 Malta 34,125 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Barbados 28,721 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Lebanon 28,273 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Sao Tome and Principe 18,667 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Macau, China 18,000 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Turks and Caicos Islands 12,505 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Marshall Islands 11,988 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low & middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 881.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.39 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.97 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 37.22 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 4.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.76 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 8.96 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 11.79 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.74 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Low & middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Low & middle income was 477.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Low & middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 477.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Low & middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2481 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Low & middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Low & middle income ranks 7th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Low & middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 140.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low & middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.