Low income vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Low income
209.37 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
5,211 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income rank
19th
Tuvalu rank
21st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Low income
  • Tuvalu
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 5,211 current US$ per square kilometre against 209.37 current US$ per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 5,002 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 24.9 times Low income's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.

Low income ranks 19th and Tuvalu ranks 21st of 45 groups.

Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1970s 28.36 current US$ per square kilometre 2,333 current US$ per square kilometre 2,305 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
1980s 35.61 current US$ per square kilometre 8,185 current US$ per square kilometre 8,150 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
1990s 62.46 current US$ per square kilometre 12,567 current US$ per square kilometre 12,504 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2000s 161.42 current US$ per square kilometre 43,375 current US$ per square kilometre 43,214 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2010s 211.45 current US$ per square kilometre 49,490 current US$ per square kilometre 49,279 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2020s 216.94 current US$ per square kilometre 28,905 current US$ per square kilometre 28,688 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Low income or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 5,211 current US$ per square kilometre against 209.37 current US$ per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Low income and Tuvalu?
5,002 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Tuvalu?
42 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2023.
How do Low income and Tuvalu rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Low income ranks 19th and Tuvalu ranks 21st of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/low-income/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/low-income/tuvalu/">Low income vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.