Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Low income
Low income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 209.37 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
209.37 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 4.6%
Rank
19th
of 45 groups
All-time high
244.98 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2018
All-time low
0.9587 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Low income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Low income is 209.37 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 4.6% on the previous year and up 6.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Low income peaked at 244.98 current US$ per square kilometre in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0.9587 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Low income ranks 19th of 45 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Low income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.9587 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +144.0% |
| 1963 | 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1964 | 3.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.1% |
| 1965 | 4.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 1966 | 4.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 1967 | 4.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 1968 | 6.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.0% |
| 1969 | 6.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1970 | 6.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 1971 | 8.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 1972 | 8.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1973 | 12.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.2% |
| 1974 | 19.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.0% |
| 1975 | 21.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1976 | 14.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.2% |
| 1977 | 16.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1978 | 23.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.2% |
| 1979 | 28.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.9% |
| 1980 | 31.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.4% |
| 1981 | 33.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1982 | 24.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.6% |
| 1983 | 27.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1984 | 29.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1985 | 28.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1986 | 33.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 1987 | 33.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1988 | 50.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.0% |
| 1989 | 57.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1990 | 62.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1991 | 64.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1992 | 87.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.7% |
| 1993 | 53.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.3% |
| 1994 | 59.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 1995 | 65.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1996 | 55.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 1997 | 61.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1998 | 63.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1999 | 50.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.0% |
| 2000 | 43.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 2001 | 66.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.9% |
| 2002 | 81.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 2003 | 127 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.8% |
| 2004 | 147.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 2005 | 168.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 2006 | 177.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2007 | 205.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.2% |
| 2008 | 231.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.4% |
| 2009 | 212.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 2010 | 235.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 2011 | 217.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 2012 | 172.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 2013 | 195.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 2014 | 226.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 2015 | 171.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.1% |
| 2016 | 202.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 2017 | 235.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.2% |
| 2018 | 244.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2019 | 212.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 2020 | 229.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 2021 | 228.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2022 | 200.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 2023 | 209.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9587 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 16.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 35.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 57.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 62.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 50.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 87.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 146.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 43.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 231.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 211.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 171.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 244.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 216.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 200.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 229.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low income
- 16 Gambia 7,194 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Mauritius 7,147 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 North Macedonia 6,362 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Albania 6,212 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Serbia 5,408 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 Tuvalu 5,211 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Montenegro 5,058 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 57.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 350.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 677.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.08 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 483.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.77 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 807.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 919.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 202.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 905.72 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Low income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Low income was 209.37 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Low income?
- The highest recorded value was 244.98 current US$ per square kilometre in 2018.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Low income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.9587 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Low income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Low income ranks 19th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Low income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.