Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Low income
Low income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per was 61.65 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
61.65 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 19.4%
Rank
29th
of 45 groups
All-time high
127.6 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2011
All-time low
0.0119 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1962
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Low income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Low income stood at 61.65 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 19.4% on the previous year and down 43.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Low income peaked at 127.6 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.0119 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
Low income ranks 29th of 45 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per in Low income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0183 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0119 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0119 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0201 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.2% |
| 1965 | 0.0228 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 1966 | 0.0238 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1967 | 0.032 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.6% |
| 1968 | 0.042 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.4% |
| 1969 | 0.1152 current US$ per square kilometre | +173.9% |
| 1970 | 0.181 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.1% |
| 1971 | 0.181 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.3985 current US$ per square kilometre | +120.2% |
| 1973 | 0.2842 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.7% |
| 1974 | 0.8528 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1975 | 0.8528 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.5% |
| 1977 | 3.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +179.3% |
| 1978 | 6.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +106.1% |
| 1979 | 11.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.8% |
| 1980 | 13.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.1% |
| 1981 | 11.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 1982 | 15.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.9% |
| 1983 | 13.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.6% |
| 1984 | 11.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 1985 | 10.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 1986 | 19.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +97.6% |
| 1987 | 32.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.7% |
| 1988 | 41.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.0% |
| 1989 | 40.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1990 | 28.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.5% |
| 1991 | 43.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.7% |
| 1992 | 24.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.1% |
| 1993 | 30.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.5% |
| 1994 | 61.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.2% |
| 1995 | 38.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 1996 | 31.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 1997 | 30.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1998 | 32.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1999 | 38.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 2000 | 25 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.5% |
| 2001 | 13.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.3% |
| 2002 | 18.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.2% |
| 2003 | 25.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.2% |
| 2004 | 27.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2005 | 48.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +74.7% |
| 2006 | 41.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 2007 | 41.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2008 | 55.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.4% |
| 2009 | 80.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.5% |
| 2010 | 126.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.8% |
| 2011 | 127.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2012 | 114.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 2013 | 109.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2014 | 71.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.1% |
| 2015 | 62.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 2016 | 59.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 2017 | 62.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2018 | 56.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 2019 | 57.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2020 | 52.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 2021 | 65.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.6% |
| 2022 | 51.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.6% |
| 2023 | 61.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0331 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0119 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1152 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.181 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 20.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 41.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 36.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 37.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 80.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 84.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 56.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 127.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 57.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 51.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 65.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low income
- 26 Djibouti 1,857 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Sao Tome and Principe 1,629 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Bhutan 1,597 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Samoa 1,513 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1,503 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Ukraine 1,412 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Sri Lanka 1,238 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 57.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 350.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 677.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.08 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 483.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.77 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 807.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 919.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 202.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 905.72 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Low income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per in Low income was 61.65 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Low income?
- The highest recorded value was 127.6 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per recorded in Low income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0119 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Low income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- Low income ranks 29th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per rising or falling in Low income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 43.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.