Bhutan vs Low income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Bhutan
1,597 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income
61.65 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
28th
Low income rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Bhutan
  • Low income
05001.0k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 1,597 current US$ per square kilometre against 61.65 current US$ per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 1,535 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 25.9 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 28th and Low income ranks 29th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 6 and Low income in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Low income Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4281 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0393 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3888 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6831 current US$ per square kilometre Low income
1980s 67.53 current US$ per square kilometre 20.99 current US$ per square kilometre 46.53 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 381.99 current US$ per square kilometre 36.02 current US$ per square kilometre 345.97 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 416.73 current US$ per square kilometre 37.75 current US$ per square kilometre 378.98 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 686.61 current US$ per square kilometre 84.79 current US$ per square kilometre 601.82 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 880.23 current US$ per square kilometre 57.8 current US$ per square kilometre 822.43 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Bhutan or Low income?
Bhutan, at 1,597 current US$ per square kilometre against 61.65 current US$ per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Bhutan and Low income?
1,535 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Low income?
60 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Low income rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Bhutan ranks 28th and Low income ranks 29th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Low income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/low-income/">Bhutan vs Low income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.