OECD members vs Tonga: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

OECD members
3.42 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Tonga
1,938 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
43rd
Tonga rank
44th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • OECD members
  • Tonga
05.0k10.0k197019962023

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 1,938 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.42 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 1,935 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tonga's figure about 567.4 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Tonga ahead.

OECD members ranks 43rd and Tonga ranks 44th of 45 groups.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Tonga Difference Ahead
1970s 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre 1,495 current US$ per square kilometre 1,494 current US$ per square kilometre Tonga
1980s 0.6197 current US$ per square kilometre 2,524 current US$ per square kilometre 2,523 current US$ per square kilometre Tonga
1990s 21.73 current US$ per square kilometre 2,787 current US$ per square kilometre 2,765 current US$ per square kilometre Tonga
2000s 35.23 current US$ per square kilometre 1,525 current US$ per square kilometre 1,490 current US$ per square kilometre Tonga
2010s 53.1 current US$ per square kilometre 4,926 current US$ per square kilometre 4,873 current US$ per square kilometre Tonga
2020s 9.84 current US$ per square kilometre 1,384 current US$ per square kilometre 1,374 current US$ per square kilometre Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, OECD members or Tonga?
Tonga, at 1,938 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.42 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between OECD members and Tonga?
1,935 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Tonga?
45 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2022.
How do OECD members and Tonga rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
OECD members ranks 43rd and Tonga ranks 44th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Tonga: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/oecd-members/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/oecd-members/tonga/">OECD members vs Tonga: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.