Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in OECD members
OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 3.42 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in OECD members, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
OECD members recorded 3.42 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in 2022.
The figure is down 84.7% on the previous year and down 95.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in OECD members peaked at 85.06 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, -0.0583 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1980.
OECD members ranks 43rd of 45 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in OECD members, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.2102 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.3869 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.0% |
| 1972 | 0.5254 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.8% |
| 1973 | 0.1542 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.7% |
| 1974 | 0.1422 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1975 | 0.0933 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.4% |
| 1976 | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +1999.1% |
| 1977 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.1% |
| 1978 | 0.5777 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.7% |
| 1979 | 3.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +420.2% |
| 1980 | -0.0583 current US$ per square kilometre | -101.9% |
| 1981 | 0.6673 current US$ per square kilometre | -1244.4% |
| 1982 | 0.3146 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.9% |
| 1983 | 0.8093 current US$ per square kilometre | +157.2% |
| 1984 | 0.5692 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.7% |
| 1985 | 0.2222 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.0% |
| 1986 | 2.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +924.8% |
| 1987 | 0.5283 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.8% |
| 1988 | 0.5183 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1989 | 0.3496 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.5% |
| 1990 | 9.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +2696.0% |
| 1991 | 32.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +227.5% |
| 1992 | 7.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.8% |
| 1993 | 8.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1994 | 16.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +91.4% |
| 1995 | 7.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.2% |
| 1996 | 18.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +146.3% |
| 1997 | 20.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1998 | 38.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.6% |
| 1999 | 45.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 2000 | 54.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 2001 | 48.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2002 | 34.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.3% |
| 2003 | 55.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.3% |
| 2004 | 74.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.8% |
| 2005 | 13.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.9% |
| 2006 | 13.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2007 | 18.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.4% |
| 2008 | 14.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 2009 | 24.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.9% |
| 2010 | 10.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.0% |
| 2011 | 85.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +701.4% |
| 2012 | 83.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2013 | 68.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 2014 | 80.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 2015 | 52.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.4% |
| 2016 | 81.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.1% |
| 2017 | 48.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.8% |
| 2018 | 15.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.0% |
| 2019 | 3.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.1% |
| 2020 | 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 2021 | 22.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +487.3% |
| 2022 | 3.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.7% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in OECD members changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | +2696.0% | 0.3496 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.78 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1976 | +1999.1% | 0.0933 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1981 | +1244.4% | -0.0583 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6673 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1986 | +924.8% | 0.2222 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.28 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 2011 | +701.4% | 10.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 85.06 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 2021 | +487.3% | 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.3 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.8226 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0933 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6197 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0583 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 20.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 45.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 35.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 74.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 53.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 85.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 9.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near OECD members
- 40 Slovenia 2,422 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Rwanda 2,307 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Latvia 2,146 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2,134 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Tonga 1,938 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Croatia 1,883 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 46 Haiti 1,842 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for OECD members
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 31.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 14.83 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 75.99 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.64 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 39.41 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 387.66 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 673.54 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 108.61 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 45.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 477.76 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in OECD members?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in OECD members was 3.42 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in OECD members?
- The highest recorded value was 85.06 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in OECD members?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0583 current US$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- How does OECD members rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- OECD members ranks 43rd out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in OECD members?
- Over the last ten years it is down 95.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this OECD members data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.