OECD members vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

OECD members
3.42 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Rwanda
2,307 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
43rd
Rwanda rank
41st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • OECD members
  • Rwanda
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 2,307 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.42 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 2,304 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 675.4 times OECD members's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 43rd and Rwanda ranks 41st of 45 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 0.8226 current US$ per square kilometre 429.02 current US$ per square kilometre 428.2 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.6197 current US$ per square kilometre 832.79 current US$ per square kilometre 832.17 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 20.53 current US$ per square kilometre 1,648 current US$ per square kilometre 1,628 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 35.23 current US$ per square kilometre 2,837 current US$ per square kilometre 2,802 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 53.1 current US$ per square kilometre 3,820 current US$ per square kilometre 3,766 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 9.84 current US$ per square kilometre 2,470 current US$ per square kilometre 2,460 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, OECD members or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 2,307 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.42 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between OECD members and Rwanda?
2,304 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Rwanda?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do OECD members and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
OECD members ranks 43rd and Rwanda ranks 41st of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/oecd-members/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/oecd-members/rwanda/">OECD members vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.