Serbia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Serbia
5,408 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
210.79 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia rank
20th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
18th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Serbia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 5,408 current US$ per square kilometre against 210.79 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 5,197 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Serbia's figure about 25.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Serbia ranks 20th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 18th of 170 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 3,480 current US$ per square kilometre 202.6 current US$ per square kilometre 3,278 current US$ per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 5,016 current US$ per square kilometre 213.92 current US$ per square kilometre 4,802 current US$ per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 4,472 current US$ per square kilometre 220.8 current US$ per square kilometre 4,251 current US$ per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Serbia or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Serbia, at 5,408 current US$ per square kilometre against 210.79 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Serbia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
5,197 current US$ per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Serbia and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Serbia ranks 20th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 18th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/serbia/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/serbia/sub-saharan-africa/">Serbia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.