Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 210.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
210.79 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 14.6%
Rank
18th
of 45 groups
All-time high
285.16 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
All-time low
0.7343 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa is 210.79 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 14.6% on the previous year and up 6.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa peaked at 285.16 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.7343 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Sub-Saharan Africa 18th out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.7343 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 2.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +242.7% |
| 1963 | 2.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.4% |
| 1964 | 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.4% |
| 1965 | 4.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 1966 | 4.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1967 | 4.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1968 | 7.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.1% |
| 1969 | 5.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.6% |
| 1970 | 6.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.5% |
| 1971 | 7.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.1% |
| 1972 | 6.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 1973 | 10.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.3% |
| 1974 | 15.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.7% |
| 1975 | 18.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.4% |
| 1976 | 14.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.2% |
| 1977 | 14.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1978 | 23.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.3% |
| 1979 | 32.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 1980 | 31.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1981 | 36.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 1982 | 28.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.4% |
| 1983 | 25.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 1984 | 33.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 1985 | 39.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 1986 | 44.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1987 | 44.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1988 | 71.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.6% |
| 1989 | 77 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1990 | 74.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1991 | 79.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1992 | 115.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.5% |
| 1993 | 77.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.8% |
| 1994 | 97.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 1995 | 82.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 1996 | 93.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1997 | 84.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1998 | 78.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 1999 | 72.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 2000 | 52.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.0% |
| 2001 | 78.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.2% |
| 2002 | 84.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2003 | 117.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.9% |
| 2004 | 136.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 2005 | 149.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 2006 | 157.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2007 | 197.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 2008 | 229.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 2009 | 225.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2010 | 223.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2011 | 226.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2012 | 214.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 2013 | 198.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 2014 | 221.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2015 | 176.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.2% |
| 2016 | 203.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2017 | 210.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2018 | 235.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2019 | 227.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2020 | 285.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.3% |
| 2021 | 203.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.7% |
| 2022 | 183.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 2023 | 210.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7343 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 15.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 43.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 77 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 85.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 72.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 115.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 142.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 52.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 229.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 213.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 176.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 235.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 220.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 183.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 285.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sub-Saharan Africa
- 15 Micronesia, Federated States of 7,319 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Gambia 7,194 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Mauritius 7,147 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 North Macedonia 6,362 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Albania 6,212 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Serbia 5,408 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 Tuvalu 5,211 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sub-Saharan Africa
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 121.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 460.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.49 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.04 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 658.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 4.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.95 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.40 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 303.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.70 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa was 210.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 285.16 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.7343 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Sub-Saharan Africa rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 18th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sub-Saharan Africa data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.