Angola vs Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland … Finland gaps
Angola
63,412 current US$
in 2023
Korea
50,000 current US$
in 1994
Angola rank
104th
Korea rank
107th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland … Finland gaps over time
- Angola
- Korea
How they compare
Angola currently reports 63,412 current US$ against 50,000 current US$ in Korea, a difference of 13,412 current US$.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.3 times Korea's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 104th and Korea ranks 107th of 146 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 680,500 current US$ | 23,000 current US$ | 657,500 current US$ | Angola |
| 1990s | 1.02 million current US$ | 144,000 current US$ | 880,000 current US$ | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Angola or Korea?
- Angola, at 63,412 current US$ against 50,000 current US$ in Korea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Angola and Korea?
- 13,412 current US$, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Korea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 1994.
- How do Angola and Korea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Angola ranks 104th and Korea ranks 107th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.