Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland … Finland gaps in Korea
Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland … Finland gaps was 50,000 current US$ in 1994. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in Korea, 1976–1994
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 1994, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in Korea stood at 50,000 current US$.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 16.7% on the previous year and up 400.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in Korea peaked at 290,000 current US$ in 1990 and was at its lowest, 10,000 current US$, in 1976.
That places Korea 107th out of 146 countries with data for 1994, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland … Finland gaps in Korea, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1976 | 10,000 current US$ | — |
| 1977 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 20,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1981 | 20,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 20,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 10,000 current US$ | -50.0% |
| 1984 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 10,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 20,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1987 | 10,000 current US$ | -50.0% |
| 1988 | 40,000 current US$ | +300.0% |
| 1989 | 70,000 current US$ | +75.0% |
| 1990 | 290,000 current US$ | +314.3% |
| 1991 | 160,000 current US$ | -44.8% |
| 1992 | 160,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 60,000 current US$ | -62.5% |
| 1994 | 50,000 current US$ | -16.7% |
Korea compared with similar countries
- Korea's 50,000 current US$ is above the median for high income countries, which is 50,000 current US$, 1.0× the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Korea's 50,000 current US$ is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 211,637 current US$, 24% of the median. (19 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland … Finland gaps in Korea changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | +314.3% | 70,000 current US$ | 290,000 current US$ |
| 1988 | +300.0% | 10,000 current US$ | 40,000 current US$ |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 10,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 4 |
| 1980s | 23,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 70,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 144,000 current US$ | 50,000 current US$ | 290,000 current US$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Korea
More aid effectiveness data for Korea
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 1.74 million current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 770,000 current US$ (1998)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 10,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 50,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 25.76 million current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 9.74 million current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 240,000 current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.65 million current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -49.52 million current US$ (1999)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in Korea?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in Korea was 50,000 current US$ in 1994, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps recorded in Korea?
- The highest recorded value was 290,000 current US$ in 1990.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps recorded in Korea?
- The lowest recorded value was 10,000 current US$ in 1976.
- How does Korea rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Korea ranks 107th out of 146 countries with data for 1994.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Korea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 400.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Korea data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.