Belarus vs Chile: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps
Belarus
233,035 current US$
in 2023
Chile
273,665 current US$
in 2016
Belarus rank
77th
Chile rank
74th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps over time
- Belarus
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 273,665 current US$ against 233,035 current US$ in Belarus, a difference of 40,630 current US$.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chile ahead.
Belarus ranks 77th and Chile ranks 74th of 146 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 141,000 current US$ | 180,000 current US$ | 39,000 current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 335,155 current US$ | 432,000 current US$ | 96,845 current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Belarus or Chile?
- Chile, at 273,665 current US$ against 233,035 current US$ in Belarus as of 2016.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Belarus and Chile?
- 40,630 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Chile?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2016.
- How do Belarus and Chile rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Belarus ranks 77th and Chile ranks 74th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.