Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in Belarus

Belarus: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps was 233,035 current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
233,035 current US$
Change on year
up 32.5%
World rank
77th
of 146 countries
All-time high
410,000 current US$
in 2011
All-time low
10,000 current US$
in 2005
Years of data
19
2005–2023

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in Belarus, 2005–2023

0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k2005201420232005: 10.0k current US$2006: 55.0k current US$2007: 100.0k current US$2008: 170.0k current US$2009: 370.0k current US$2010: 370.0k current US$2011: 410.0k current US$2012: 359.3k current US$2013: 383.2k current US$2014: 388.0k current US$2015: 330.6k current US$2016: 105.1k current US$2017: 83.5k current US$2018: 145.4k current US$2019: 151.1k current US$2020: 151.1k current US$2021: 174.1k current US$2022: 175.9k current US$2023: 233.0k current US$

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in Belarus is 233,035 current US$, measured in 2023.

That represents a change of up 32.5% on the previous year and down 39.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in Belarus peaked at 410,000 current US$ in 2011 and was at its lowest, 10,000 current US$, in 2005.

Belarus ranks 77th of 146 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled in Belarus, 2005 to 2023.
Year current US$ Change
2005 10,000 current US$
2006 55,000 current US$ +450.0%
2007 100,000 current US$ +81.8%
2008 170,000 current US$ +70.0%
2009 370,000 current US$ +117.6%
2010 370,000 current US$ +0.0%
2011 410,000 current US$ +10.8%
2012 359,296 current US$ -12.4%
2013 383,208 current US$ +6.7%
2014 387,955 current US$ +1.2%
2015 330,570 current US$ -14.8%
2016 105,056 current US$ -68.2%
2017 83,502 current US$ -20.5%
2018 145,388 current US$ +74.1%
2019 151,118 current US$ +3.9%
2020 151,133 current US$ +0.0%
2021 174,093 current US$ +15.2%
2022 175,902 current US$ +1.0%
2023 233,035 current US$ +32.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 141,000 current US$ 10,000 current US$ 370,000 current US$ 5
2010s 272,609 current US$ 83,502 current US$ 410,000 current US$ 10
2020s 183,541 current US$ 151,133 current US$ 233,035 current US$ 4

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 74 Chile 273,665 current US$ compare
  2. 75 Paraguay 250,863 current US$ compare
  3. 76 Mexico 235,882 current US$ compare
  4. 78 Botswana 231,259 current US$ compare
  5. 79 China 211,637 current US$ compare
  6. 80 Mauritania 158,452 current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 192 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in Belarus?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in Belarus was 233,035 current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 410,000 current US$ in 2011.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 10,000 current US$ in 2005.
How does Belarus rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
Belarus ranks 77th out of 146 countries with data for 2023.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 39.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-gaps-filled/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-gaps-filled/belarus/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,075 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.