Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Belarus

Belarus: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps was 611,004 current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
611,004 current US$
Change on year
up 18.7%
World rank
80th
of 143 countries
All-time high
3.70 million current US$
in 2011
All-time low
56,827 current US$
in 2019
Years of data
18
2006–2023

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Belarus, 2006–2023

01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M2006201420232006: 190.0k current US$2007: 2.5M current US$2008: 3.3M current US$2009: 2.6M current US$2010: 2.2M current US$2011: 3.7M current US$2012: 3.5M current US$2013: 3.1M current US$2014: 3.0M current US$2015: 1.5M current US$2016: 436.6k current US$2017: 68.8k current US$2018: 86.9k current US$2019: 56.8k current US$2020: 568.4k current US$2021: 465.6k current US$2022: 514.9k current US$2023: 611.0k current US$

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 611,004 current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in 2023.

The figure is up 18.7% on the previous year and down 80.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Belarus peaked at 3.70 million current US$ in 2011 and was at its lowest, 56,827 current US$, in 2019.

Belarus ranks 80th of 143 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled in Belarus, 2006 to 2023.
Year current US$ Change
2006 190,000 current US$
2007 2.51 million current US$ +1221.1%
2008 3.32 million current US$ +32.3%
2009 2.58 million current US$ -22.3%
2010 2.21 million current US$ -14.3%
2011 3.70 million current US$ +67.4%
2012 3.54 million current US$ -4.3%
2013 3.08 million current US$ -13.0%
2014 3.04 million current US$ -1.4%
2015 1.53 million current US$ -49.7%
2016 436,639 current US$ -71.5%
2017 68,791 current US$ -84.2%
2018 86,927 current US$ +26.4%
2019 56,827 current US$ -34.6%
2020 568,351 current US$ +900.1%
2021 465,576 current US$ -18.1%
2022 514,933 current US$ +10.6%
2023 611,004 current US$ +18.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.15 million current US$ 190,000 current US$ 3.32 million current US$ 4
2010s 1.77 million current US$ 56,827 current US$ 3.70 million current US$ 10
2020s 539,966 current US$ 465,576 current US$ 611,004 current US$ 4

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 77 El Salvador 728,396 current US$ compare
  2. 78 Eswatini 671,584 current US$ compare
  3. 79 Tajikistan 662,910 current US$ compare
  4. 81 Lithuania 590,000 current US$
  5. 82 Nicaragua 497,932 current US$ compare
  6. 83 Congo 426,197 current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Belarus?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Belarus was 611,004 current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 3.70 million current US$ in 2011.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 56,827 current US$ in 2019.
How does Belarus rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
Belarus ranks 80th out of 143 countries with data for 2023.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 80.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 18 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/belarus/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,011 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.