Belarus vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time
- Belarus
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 671,584 current US$ against 611,004 current US$ in Belarus, a difference of 60,580 current US$.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Eswatini ahead.
Belarus ranks 80th and Eswatini ranks 78th of 143 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.15 million current US$ | 1.68 million current US$ | 470,000 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1.77 million current US$ | 999,097 current US$ | 775,838 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2020s | 539,966 current US$ | 707,447 current US$ | 167,481 current US$ | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, Belarus or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 671,584 current US$ against 611,004 current US$ in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between Belarus and Eswatini?
- 60,580 current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eswatini?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Eswatini rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- Belarus ranks 80th and Eswatini ranks 78th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.