Belarus vs Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time
- Belarus
- Congo
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 611,004 current US$ against 426,197 current US$ in Congo, a difference of 184,807 current US$.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.4 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Congo ahead.
Belarus ranks 80th and Congo ranks 83rd of 143 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Congo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.15 million current US$ | 457,500 current US$ | 1.69 million current US$ | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1.77 million current US$ | 361,046 current US$ | 1.41 million current US$ | Belarus |
| 2020s | 539,966 current US$ | 637,213 current US$ | 97,247 current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, Belarus or Congo?
- Belarus, at 611,004 current US$ against 426,197 current US$ in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between Belarus and Congo?
- 184,807 current US$, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Congo?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Congo rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- Belarus ranks 80th and Congo ranks 83rd of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.