Congo vs Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per

Congo
282.1 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
301.98 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
44th
Tunisia rank
43rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per over time

  • Congo
  • Tunisia
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 301.98 current US$ per square kilometre against 282.1 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 19.88 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Tunisia ahead.

Congo ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 43rd of 167 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 33.82 current US$ per square kilometre 102.24 current US$ per square kilometre 68.41 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 72.01 current US$ per square kilometre 270.83 current US$ per square kilometre 198.82 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 170.8 current US$ per square kilometre 341.7 current US$ per square kilometre 170.9 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 360.51 current US$ per square kilometre 520.6 current US$ per square kilometre 160.09 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 498 current US$ per square kilometre 864.11 current US$ per square kilometre 366.11 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 374.06 current US$ per square kilometre 699.86 current US$ per square kilometre 325.79 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 229.47 current US$ per square kilometre 589.19 current US$ per square kilometre 359.73 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per, Congo or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 301.98 current US$ per square kilometre against 282.1 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per between Congo and Tunisia?
19.88 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tunisia?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Congo and Tunisia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
Congo ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 43rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-france-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-france-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/tunisia/">Congo vs Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 9,160 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.