Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Tunisia
Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per was 301.98 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
301.98 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 3.5%
World rank
43rd
of 167 countries
All-time high
1,959 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2011
All-time low
57.29 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1967
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Tunisia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Tunisia recorded 301.98 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in 2023.
That represents a change of down 3.5% on the previous year and down 29.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Tunisia peaked at 1,959 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 57.29 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1967.
Tunisia ranks 43rd of 167 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 97.19 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 101.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1963 | 184.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.6% |
| 1964 | 128.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.3% |
| 1965 | 128.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 92.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.0% |
| 1967 | 57.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.2% |
| 1968 | 75.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.5% |
| 1969 | 130.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.5% |
| 1970 | 153.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 1971 | 137.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 1972 | 188.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.7% |
| 1973 | 262.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.5% |
| 1974 | 243.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1975 | 258.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1976 | 337.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.8% |
| 1977 | 335.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1978 | 409.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 1979 | 381.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1980 | 510.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.8% |
| 1981 | 322.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.7% |
| 1982 | 334.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1983 | 240.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.2% |
| 1984 | 327.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 1985 | 318.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1986 | 370.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 1987 | 363.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1988 | 276.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.8% |
| 1989 | 351.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.0% |
| 1990 | 490.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.4% |
| 1991 | 508.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1992 | 663.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.4% |
| 1993 | 480.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.7% |
| 1994 | 493.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1995 | 555.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1996 | 378.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.9% |
| 1997 | 388.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1998 | 581.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.9% |
| 1999 | 666.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 2000 | 597.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 2001 | 563.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2002 | 621.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2003 | 692.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2004 | 910.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.5% |
| 2005 | 1,170 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 2006 | 1,135 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 2007 | 823.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.4% |
| 2008 | 1,033 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.4% |
| 2009 | 1,094 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2010 | 816.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.4% |
| 2011 | 1,959 current US$ per square kilometre | +140.0% |
| 2012 | 1,561 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.3% |
| 2013 | 430.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.4% |
| 2014 | 427.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2015 | 140.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.1% |
| 2016 | 438.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +211.3% |
| 2017 | 399.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2018 | 61.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.7% |
| 2019 | 764.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +1146.9% |
| 2020 | 804.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2021 | 937.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 2022 | 312.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.6% |
| 2023 | 301.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 110.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 57.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 184.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 270.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 137.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 409.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 341.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 240.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 510.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 520.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 378.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 666.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 864.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 563.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,170 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 699.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,959 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 589.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 301.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 937.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
- 40 Jordan 378.45 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Cameroon 309.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Azerbaijan 302.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Congo 282.1 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Sao Tome and Principe 275.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 46 Cyprus 266.23 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Tunisia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 696,474 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 134,083 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 5.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 95.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 32.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 213.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 46.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 4.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 31.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 162.74 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Tunisia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Tunisia was 301.98 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 1,959 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was 57.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 1967.
- How does Tunisia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
- Tunisia ranks 43rd out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 29.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.